当前位置: X-MOL 学术JAMA Surg. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Interpreting the Long-term Prognostic Value of Total Mesorectal Excision Plane Quality in Rectal Adenocarcinoma.
JAMA Surgery ( IF 16.9 ) Pub Date : 2019-01-01 , DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3540
Ryan Sun 1 , Hwajeong Lee 2 , Lee-Jen Wei 1
Affiliation  

To the Editor Kitz et al1 evaluated the prognostic value of total mesorectal excision (TME) plane in patients with rectal cancer. Total mesorectal excision plane quality was grouped into 3 categories: mesorectal, intramesorectal, and muscularis propria. One end point was disease-free survival (DFS). The authors quantified the between-group differences using 3-year event-free rates and hazard ratios (HRs). Three-year DFS rate estimates for mesorectal, intramesorectal, and muscularis propria TME were 75.9% (95% CI, 73.1-78.8), 68.4% (95% CI, 61.6-76.0), and 67.2% (95% CI, 55.6-81.3), respectively. Because these confidence intervals overlap, it is unclear whether there is a true difference between certain pairs, eg, between intramesorectal and muscularis propria TME. Moreover, in Figure 2A,1 the DFS curves extend up to 60 months. Thus, the 3-year event rate provides a local profile of DFS only. To use data after 3 years, the authors reported HRs for DFS (intramesorectal vs mesorectal TME: HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.01-1.80; muscularis propria vs mesorectal TME: HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.13-2.66). However, it is difficult to interpret HRs in the clinical context. The hazard is not a chance or probability measure and therefore is not equivalent to risk. Thus, an HR of 1.35 cannot be translated into a 35% risk increase. Also, no reference hazard value from mesorectal TME was provided. If mesorectal TME hazard is low, a 35% increase in hazard may not be clinically significant. Other issues and concerns in using HRs to quantify between-group differences have been discussed extensively.2-4



中文翻译:

解释直肠腺癌总直肠系膜切除平面质量的长期预后价值。

致编辑Kitz等[ 1]评估了直肠癌患者全直肠系膜切除(TME)平面的预后价值。总直肠系膜切除平面质量分为三类:直肠系膜,直肠内膜和固有肌层。终点是无病生存期(DFS)。作者使用3年无事件发生率和危险比(HRs)量化了组间差异。直肠,肠系膜内和固有肌层TME的三年DFS率估计分别为75.9%(95%CI,73.1-78.8),68.4%(95%CI,61.6-76.0)和67.2%(95%CI,55.6- 81.3)。由于这些置信区间重叠,因此尚不清楚某些对之间(例如,大肠直肠内和固有肌层TME之间)是否存在真正的差异。此外,在图2A中,1 DFS曲线长达60个月。因此,三年事件发生率仅提供了DFS的本地资料。为了使用3年后的数据,作者报告了DFS的心率(直肠内与直肠中膜TME:HR,1.35; 95%CI,1.01-1.80;固有肌与直肠中膜TME:HR,1.73; 95%CI,1.13-2.66)。但是,很难在临床背景下解释HR。危害不是机会或概率度量,因此不等同于风险。因此,HR为1.35不能转化为35%的风险增加。同样,没有提供来自直肠系膜TME的参考危险值。如果直肠系膜TME危险性较低,则危险性增加35%在临床上可能并不重要。关于使用人力资源来量化组间差异的其他问题和关注,已经进行了广泛的讨论。2 -4

更新日期:2019-01-17
down
wechat
bug