当前位置: X-MOL 学术Dent. Mater. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Preparation and characterization of Bis-GMA-free dental composites with dimethacrylate monomer derived from 9,9-Bis[4-(2-hydroxyethoxy)phenyl]fluorene
Dental Materials ( IF 5 ) Pub Date : 2018-04-13
Jingwei He, Hilde M. Kopperud

Objective

Synthesize a new BPA-free monomer for use in methacrylate-based materials and evaluate critical properties of resin and composite materials based on the monomer.

Methods

Bis-EFMA was synthesized through reaction between 9,9-bis[4-(2-hydroxyethoxy)-phenyl]fluorene and 2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl isocyanate. Experimental Bis-EFMA-based resin (Bis-EFMA/TEGDMA = 50/50, wt./wt.) and composite were prepared. Critical properties were investigated according to standard or referenced methods Bis-GMA/TEGDMA (50/50, wt./wt.) resin system, Bis-GMA-based composite and 3 M ESPE Filtek™ Z250 were used as controls.

Results

FT-IR and 1H NMR spectra confirmed the structure of Bis-EFMA monomer. Cured resin materials: Bis-EFMA-based and Bis-GMA-based resins had nearly the same degree of conversion (p > 0.05); Bis-EFMA-based resin had significantly lower shrinkage, water sorption and solubility, and cytotoxicity than Bis-GMA-based resin (p < 0.05); flexural properties of Bis-EFMA-based resin were all higher than those of Bis-GMA-based resin (p < 0.05). Cured composite materials: There was no significant difference in conversion (> 0.05); Bis-EFMA-based composite had significantly lower shrinkage and solubility (< 0.05); water sorption of Bis-EFMA-based composite and Z250 were similar (> 0.05), but lower compared to Bis-GMA-based composite (p < 0.05); Bis-EFMA-based composite had the deepest curing depth (< 0.05); Before water immersion, there was no significant difference in flexural strength between Bis-EFMA-based composite and each control composite (> 0.05), while FS became lower than that of Z250 (< 0.05), but higher than that of Bis-GMA-based composite (< 0.05) after water immersion; Flexural modulus of Bis-EFMA-based composite and Z250 were nearly the same (> 0.05), higher than that of Bis-GMA-based composite (< 0.05); Bis-EFMA-based composite showed less cytotoxicity than Bis-GMA-based composite and Z250 (< 0.05).

Significance

Bis-EFMA has potential as a substitute for Bis-GMA to prepare Bis-GMA-free dental composites.



中文翻译:

9,9-双[4-(2-羟基乙氧基)苯基]芴衍生的二甲基丙烯酸酯单体的无Bis-GMA牙科复合材料的制备和表征

客观的

合成一种新的不含BPA的单体,用于基于甲基丙烯酸酯的材料,并评估基于该单体的树脂和复合材料的关键性能。

方法

通过9,9-双[4-(2-羟基乙氧基)-苯基]芴与2-(甲基丙烯酰氧基)乙基异氰酸酯之间的反应合成Bis-EFMA。制备实验性的基于Bis-EFMA的树脂(Bis-EFMA / TEGDMA = 50/50,wt./wt。)和复合材料。根据标准或参考方法研究了关键性能,将Bis-GMA / TEGDMA(50/50,wt./wt。)树脂体系,基于Bis-GMA的复合材料和3 M ESPE Filtek™Z250用作对照。

结果

FT-IR和1 H NMR光谱证实了Bis-EFMA单体的结构。固化树脂材料:Bis-EFMA基树脂和Bis-GMA基树脂具有几乎相同的转化度(p>  0.05);与基于Bis-GMA的树脂相比,基于Bis-EFMA的树脂的收缩率,吸水率和溶解度以及细胞毒性显着更低(p <0.05);Bis-EFMA基树脂的弯曲性能均高于Bis-GMA基树脂(p <0.05)。固化的复合材料:转化率无显着差异( > 0.05);Bis-EFMA基复合材料的收缩率和溶解度显着降低( <0.05);Bis-EFMA基复合材料和Z250的吸水率相似(> 0.05),但低于基于Bis-GMA的复合材料(p <  0.05);Bis-EFMA基复合材料的固化深度最深( <0.05);浸水前,基于Bis-EFMA的复合材料与每个对照复合材料的抗弯强度没有显着差异( > 0.05),而FS低于Z250( <0.05),但高于Bis-浸水后基于GMA的复合材料( <0.05);Bis-EFMA基复合材料和Z250的弯曲模量几乎相同( > 0.05),高于Bis-GMA基复合材料的弯曲模量( <0.05);基于Bis-EFMA的复合材料的细胞毒性比基于Bis-GMA的复合材料和Z250(<0.05)。

意义

Bis-EFMA有潜力替代Bis-GMA来制备不含Bis-GMA的牙科复合材料。

更新日期:2018-04-25
down
wechat
bug