当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ann. Intern. Med. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Percutaneous Closure Versus Medical Treatment in Stroke Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Annals of Internal Medicine ( IF 39.2 ) Pub Date : 2018-01-09 , DOI: 10.7326/m17-3033
Salvatore De Rosa 1 , Horst Sievert 2 , Jolanda Sabatino 1 , Alberto Polimeni 1 , Sabato Sorrentino 1 , Ciro Indolfi 3
Affiliation  

Background:

New evidence emerged recently regarding the percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) to prevent recurrent stroke in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Purpose:

To compare risks for recurrent cerebrovascular events in adults with PFO and cryptogenic stroke who underwent PFO closure versus those who received medical therapy alone.

Data Sources:

PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar from 1 December 2004 through 14 September 2017; references of eligible studies; relevant scientific session abstracts; and cardiology Web sites.

Study Selection:

Randomized controlled trials, published in English, that compared PFO closure using a currently available device with medical treatment alone and that reported, at minimum, the rates of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) or of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL).

Data Extraction:

2 investigators independently extracted study data and assessed study quality.

Data Synthesis:

4 of 5 trials comparing PFO closure with medical therapy used commercially available devices. These 4 trials, involving 2531 patients, found that PFO closure reduced the risk for the main outcome of stroke or TIA (risk difference [RD], −0.029 [95% CI, −0.050 to −0.007]) and increased the risk for new-onset AF or AFL (RD, 0.033 [CI, 0.012 to 0.054]). The beneficial effect of PFO closure was associated with larger interatrial shunts (P = 0.034).

Limitation:

Trials were not double-blind, and inclusion criteria were heterogeneous.

Conclusion:

Compared with medical treatment, PFO closure prevents recurrent stroke and TIA but increases the incidence of AF or AFL in PFO carriers with cryptogenic stroke.

Primary Funding Source:

Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR). (PROSPERO: CRD42017074686)



中文翻译:

经皮封闭与药物治疗卵圆孔未闭的卒中患者:系统评价和荟萃分析

背景:

最近出现了有关经皮闭合卵圆孔未闭(PFO)的新证据,以预防隐源性卒中患者复发性卒中。

目的:

为了比较接受PFO封闭的PFO和隐源性卒中的成年人与仅接受药物治疗的成年人发生反复脑血管事件的风险。

数据源:

2004年12月1日至2017年9月14日之间的PubMed,Scopus和Google Scholar;符合条件的研究的参考资料;相关的科学会议摘要;和心脏病学网站。

研究选择:

用英语发表的随机对照试验,比较了使用目前可用的装置与单独使用药物进行PFO封闭的情况,并至少报告了中风或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或新发房颤(AF)或心房扑动(AFL)。

数据提取:

2名研究者独立提取研究数据并评估研究质量。

数据综合:

5个试验中有4个比较了PFO封堵与药物治疗使用的市售设备。这4项试验涉及2531名患者,发现PFO封堵可降低中风或TIA主要预后的风险(风险差异[RD],-0.029 [95%CI,-0.050至-0.007]),并增加新发风险。发作的AF或AFL(RD,0.033 [CI,0.012至0.054])。PFO封闭的有益作用与较大的房间分流有关(P  = 0.034)。

局限性:

试验不是双盲的,并且纳入标准是异类的。

结论:

与药物治疗相比,PFO封闭可预防复发性卒中和TIA,但会增加患有隐源性卒中的PFO携带者发生AF或AFL的可能性。

主要资金来源:

意大利教育,大学与研究部(MIUR)。(PROSPERO:CRD42017074686)

更新日期:2018-01-09
down
wechat
bug