当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A real-world, community-based cohort study comparing the effectiveness of topical fluorouracil versus topical imiquimod for the treatment of actinic keratosis
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology ( IF 13.8 ) Pub Date : 2017-12-24 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.042
Romain Neugebauer , Katherine A. Levandoski , Zheng Zhu , Monica Sokil , Mary-Margaret Chren , Gary D. Friedman , Maryam M. Asgari

Background

The most widely used topical agents for the field-based treatment of multiple actinic keratoses (AKs) are 5-fluorouracil and imiquimod, but their comparative effectiveness has not been assessed in a real-world setting.

Objective

We compared the effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil and imiquimod in reducing risk for subsequent AKs in a large, integrated health care delivery system in northern California.

Methods

In this cohort study, we identified adult health plan members who had an AK diagnosed in 2007 and who subsequently filled a prescription for 5-fluorouracil or imiquimod (N = 5700). We followed subjects for subsequent AKs identified by the International Classification of Diseases codes and estimated the 2-year (short-term) and 5-year (long-term) differences in cumulative risk while controlling for potential confounding by pretreatment variables.

Results

5-Fluorouracil reduced the short-term incidence of subsequent AKs (cumulative risk difference -4.54% [95% confidence interval, -7.91% to -1.17%]), but there was no statistically significant evidence of a long-term decreased risk (cumulative risk difference -1.43% [95% confidence interval, -3.43% to 0.05%]) compared with that with imiquimod.

Limitations

This is a retrospective study with limited ascertainment of all relevant potential confounding variables.

Conclusion

We found that 5-fluorouracil appeared to be significantly more effective than imiquimod in the short-term, but not long-term, prevention of subsequent AKs.



中文翻译:

一项基于社区的真实世界队列研究,比较了局部用氟尿嘧啶和局部咪喹莫特治疗光化性角化病的有效性

背景

用于现场治疗多种光化性角化病(AK)的最广泛使用的局部用药是5-氟尿嘧啶和咪喹莫特,但在现实世界中尚未评估它们的比较效果。

客观的

我们在加利福尼亚北部的大型综合医疗保健提供系统中比较了5-氟尿嘧啶和咪喹莫特在降低后续AKs风险方面的有效性。

方法

在这项队列研究中,我们确定了在2007年被确诊为AK并随后开具5-氟尿嘧啶或咪喹莫特(N = 5700)处方的成年健康计划成员。我们跟踪受试者进行国际疾病分类法确定的后续AK,并估计累积风险的2年(短期)和5年(长期)差异,同时通过预处理变量控制潜在的混淆。

结果

5-氟尿嘧啶降低了后续AK的短期发生率(累积风险差异-4.54%[95%置信区间,-7.91%至-1.17%]),但没有统计学上的显着证据表明长期降低的风险(累积风险差异-1.43%[95%置信区间,-3.43%至0.05%])。

局限性

这是一项回顾性研究,仅对所有相关的潜在混淆变量进行了有限的确定。

结论

我们发现5-氟尿嘧啶在短期而非长期预防后续AK方面似乎比咪喹莫特显着更有效。

更新日期:2017-12-24
down
wechat
bug