Scientific publication is fundamentally based on peer review—a process whereby reviewers are asked to evaluate the scientific merits of the submitted manuscript contents and provide feedback.1 It is hoped that through this peer review process, good science is enhanced and bad science is dismissed.2 Journal editors will discuss the merits of a manuscript critically informed by the reviews provided.3 An invitation to conduct peer review is a chance to serve as the arbiter of scientific quality and an opportunity to participate directly in the dissemination of new knowledge. Unfortunately, many reviewers never receive formal guidance or mentorship on how best to review an original research manuscript. With the growth of academic medicine and the proliferation of open-access journals, high-quality peer reviews have …

中文翻译：

---

同行评审稿件提交

科学出版从根本上建立在同行评审的基础上，即要求评审人员评估所提交手稿内容的科学价值并提供反馈意见的过程。1希望通过这一同行评审过程，可以提高优秀科学水平，并消除劣质科学。 2期刊编辑将根据提供的评论来讨论手稿的优劣。3邀请进行同行评审是机会，可以作为科学素质的仲裁者，并且是直接参与新知识传播的机会。不幸的是，许多评论者从未获得关于如何最好地评论原始研究手稿的正式指导或指导。随着学术医学的发展和开放存取期刊的激增，高质量的同行评审已经……