Debates about neonatal imitation remain more open than Keven & Akins (K&A) imply. K&A do not recognize the primacy of the question concerning differential imitation and the links between experimental designs and more or less plausible theoretical assumptions. Moreover, they do not acknowledge previous theorizing on spontaneous behavior, the explanatory power of entrainment, and subtle connections with social cognition.

中文翻译：

---

一场悬而未决的辩论：关键的经验和理论问题仍然悬而未决

关于新生儿模仿的争论仍然比 Keven & Akins (K&A) 所暗示的更为开放。K&A 不承认差异模仿问题的首要性以及实验设计与或多或少似是而非的理论假设之间的联系。此外，他们不承认先前关于自发行为的理论、夹带的解释力以及与社会认知的微妙联系。