当前位置: X-MOL 学术Eur. Heart J. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Non-insulin antidiabetic pharmacotherapy in patients with established cardiovascular disease: a position paper of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
European Heart Journal ( IF 39.3 ) Pub Date : 2017-11-08 , DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx625
Alexander Niessner 1 , Juan Tamargo 2 , Lorenz Koller 1 , Christoph H Saely 3, 4, 5 , Thomas Andersen Schmidt 6, 7 , Gianluigi Savarese 8 , Sven Wassmann 9 , Giuseppe Rosano 10, 11 , Claudio Ceconi 12 , Christian Torp-Pedersen 13, 14 , Juan Carlos Kaski 15 , Keld Per Kjeldsen 16, 17, 18 , Stefan Agewall 19, 20 , Thomas Walther 21, 22 , Heinz Drexel 3, 4, 5, 23 , Basil S Lewis 24, 25
Affiliation  

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and established cardiovascular disease (CVD) have a particularly high risk for recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).1 Compared with patients with CVD only, the risk for MACE increases by about 1.7-fold in those with CVD and T2DM.1 Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a stronger risk factor for MACE than the angiographic severity of coronary heart disease (CHD).2 Reducing the T2DM-associated risk is therefore of utmost importance. Antidiabetic pharmacotherapy reduces plasma glucose and dosing is adjusted according to HbA1c concentration. European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommend HbA1c values <7% for patients with CVD.3 While controlling HbA1c levels is important to prevent both microvascular disease and atherosclerosis progression, the association between HbA1c and short to mid-term cardiovascular events is less well defined. Albeit early trials showed a trend towards MACE reduction with glucose lowering agents,4,5 recent data indicates that only specific antidiabetic therapies reduce MACE,6,9 and this effect appears to be independent of baseline HbA1c level or HbA1c reduction.6,7 Of note, these recent outcome trials were primarily designed as non-inferiority trials to test for cardiovascular safety with subsequent hierarchical testing for superiority only. Furthermore, in most of these trials it was possible to add other glucose-lowering therapies after randomization to achieve adequate glycaemic control resulting in an imbalance of other antidiabetic therapies between intervention and control arm which may have influenced study results. This position paper will critically appraise emerging evidence regarding antidiabetic pharmacotherapy in patients with T2DM and mostly stable CVD. While patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have been excluded from recent studies, the ELIXA and the EXAMINE trials specifically recruited patients post ACS.10,11 We have critically assessed: (i) the relevance of the study population, the presence of CVD, statistical power, concomitant cardiovascular treatments, and exclusion criteria (Table 1, Supplementary material online, Table S1), (ii) the effects of antidiabetic pharmacotherapy on cardiovascular endpoints (Figure 1, Table 2, Supplementary material online, Table S2), and (iii) the occurrence of specific adverse effects (Table 2, Supplementary material online, Table S2).12–15 In this article, we report relative risk reduction (RRR) for comparability of trial results and number needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) and absolute risk reduction (ARR) for the duration of the respective study follow-up to show the magnitude of the effect (Supplementary material online, Table S2). Based on current data, this article summarizes the positions of the ESC WG on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy on the selection of antidiabetic pharmacotherapy and potential drug combinations. The mechanisms of specific antidiabetic therapies16 and insulin therapy (including insulin analogues) will not be discussed.
Table 1

Relevance of studies for patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease

Study Class of drug Drug Power (n of patients with primary endpoint) Established cardiovascular disease Concomitant cardiovascular medication Relevant exclusion criteria Relevance of study 
EMPA-REG OUTCOME SGLT2 inhibitor Empagliflozin Adequate (772) 99% Vast majority Recent ACS, eGFR < 30 mL/min, medical history of cancer Highly relevant for stable CVD 
CANVAS Program Canagliflozin Strong (1011) 66% Majority Recent ACS, NYHA IV, eGFR < 30 mL/min, medical history of cancer Highly relevant for stable CVD 
LEADER GLP-1 receptor agonist Liraglutide Strong (1302) 81% Majority Recent ACS, NYHA IV, malignant neoplasm Highly relevant for stable CVD 
SUSTAIN-6 Semaglutide Moderate (254) 59% Majority Recent ACS, NYHA IV, malignant neoplasm, pancreatitis Relevant for stable CVD 
EXSCEL Exenatide Strong (1744) 73% Majority eGFR < 30 mL/min, personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, history of pancreatitis Highly relevant for stable CVD 
ELIXA Lixisenatide Adequate (805) 100% (ACS) Vast majority eGFR < 30 mL/min, pancreatitis, gastrointestinal disease, personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer Highly relevant for ACS 
PROACTIVE Thiazolidinedione Pioglitazone Strong (1086) 100% Majority Recent ACS, symptomatic heart failure, ketoacidosis Highly relevant for stable CVD 
SAVOR-TIMI 53 Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor Saxagliptin Strong (1222) 79% Majority Recent ACS Highly relevant for stable CVD 
EXAMINE Alogliptin Adequate (621) 100% (ACS within the previous 15–90 days) Vast majority Recent ACS, NYHA IV Highly relevant for ACS 
TECOS Sitagliptin Strong (1690) 74% Majority eGFR < 30 mL/min, ketoacidosis Highly relevant for stable CVD 
UKPDS 34 Biguanide Metformin Moderate (139 during follow-up of > 10 years) NR Limited use >65 years of age Limited relevance for CVD 
STOP-NIDDM Alpha-glucosidase inhibitor Acarbose (compared to sulfonylurea) Hypothesis generating study (47) <5% Limited use Any cardiovascular event within the last 6 months Limited relevance for CVD 
Study Class of drug Drug Power (n of patients with primary endpoint) Established cardiovascular disease Concomitant cardiovascular medication Relevant exclusion criteria Relevance of study 
EMPA-REG OUTCOME SGLT2 inhibitor Empagliflozin Adequate (772) 99% Vast majority Recent ACS, eGFR < 30 mL/min, medical history of cancer Highly relevant for stable CVD 
CANVAS Program Canagliflozin Strong (1011) 66% Majority Recent ACS, NYHA IV, eGFR < 30 mL/min, medical history of cancer Highly relevant for stable CVD 
LEADER GLP-1 receptor agonist Liraglutide Strong (1302) 81% Majority Recent ACS, NYHA IV, malignant neoplasm Highly relevant for stable CVD 
SUSTAIN-6 Semaglutide Moderate (254) 59% Majority Recent ACS, NYHA IV, malignant neoplasm, pancreatitis Relevant for stable CVD 
EXSCEL Exenatide Strong (1744) 73% Majority eGFR < 30 mL/min, personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, history of pancreatitis Highly relevant for stable CVD 
ELIXA Lixisenatide Adequate (805) 100% (ACS) Vast majority eGFR < 30 mL/min, pancreatitis, gastrointestinal disease, personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer Highly relevant for ACS 
PROACTIVE Thiazolidinedione Pioglitazone Strong (1086) 100% Majority Recent ACS, symptomatic heart failure, ketoacidosis Highly relevant for stable CVD 
SAVOR-TIMI 53 Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor Saxagliptin Strong (1222) 79% Majority Recent ACS Highly relevant for stable CVD 
EXAMINE Alogliptin Adequate (621) 100% (ACS within the previous 15–90 days) Vast majority Recent ACS, NYHA IV Highly relevant for ACS 
TECOS Sitagliptin Strong (1690) 74% Majority eGFR < 30 mL/min, ketoacidosis Highly relevant for stable CVD 
UKPDS 34 Biguanide Metformin Moderate (139 during follow-up of > 10 years) NR Limited use >65 years of age Limited relevance for CVD 
STOP-NIDDM Alpha-glucosidase inhibitor Acarbose (compared to sulfonylurea) Hypothesis generating study (47) <5% Limited use Any cardiovascular event within the last 6 months Limited relevance for CVD 

ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CVD, cardiovascular disease; NA, not applicable; NR, not reported.

Table 1

Relevance of studies for patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease

Study Class of drug Drug Power (n of patients with primary endpoint) Established cardiovascular disease Concomitant cardiovascular medication Relevant exclusion criteria Relevance of study 
EMPA-REG OUTCOME SGLT2 inhibitor Empagliflozin Adequate (772) 99% Vast majority Recent ACS, eGFR < 30 mL/min, medical history of cancer Highly relevant for stable CVD 
CANVAS Program Canagliflozin Strong (1011) 66% Majority Recent ACS, NYHA IV, eGFR < 30 mL/min, medical history of cancer Highly relevant for stable CVD 
LEADER GLP-1 receptor agonist Liraglutide Strong (1302) 81% Majority Recent ACS, NYHA IV, malignant neoplasm Highly relevant for stable CVD 
SUSTAIN-6 Semaglutide Moderate (254) 59% Majority Recent ACS, NYHA IV, malignant neoplasm, pancreatitis Relevant for stable CVD 
EXSCEL Exenatide Strong (1744) 73% Majority eGFR < 30 mL/min, personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, history of pancreatitis Highly relevant for stable CVD 
ELIXA Lixisenatide Adequate (805) 100% (ACS) Vast majority eGFR < 30 mL/min, pancreatitis, gastrointestinal disease, personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer Highly relevant for ACS 
PROACTIVE Thiazolidinedione Pioglitazone Strong (1086) 100% Majority Recent ACS, symptomatic heart failure, ketoacidosis Highly relevant for stable CVD 
SAVOR-TIMI 53 Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor Saxagliptin Strong (1222) 79% Majority Recent ACS Highly relevant for stable CVD 
EXAMINE Alogliptin Adequate (621) 100% (ACS within the previous 15–90 days) Vast majority Recent ACS, NYHA IV Highly relevant for ACS 
TECOS Sitagliptin Strong (1690) 74% Majority eGFR < 30 mL/min, ketoacidosis Highly relevant for stable CVD 
UKPDS 34 Biguanide Metformin Moderate (139 during follow-up of > 10 years) NR Limited use >65 years of age Limited relevance for CVD 
STOP-NIDDM Alpha-glucosidase inhibitor Acarbose (compared to sulfonylurea) Hypothesis generating study (47) <5% Limited use Any cardiovascular event within the last 6 months Limited relevance for CVD 
Study Class of drug Drug Power (n of patients with primary endpoint) Established cardiovascular disease Concomitant cardiovascular medication Relevant exclusion criteria Relevance of study 
EMPA-REG OUTCOME SGLT2 inhibitor Empagliflozin Adequate (772) 99% Vast majority Recent ACS, eGFR < 30 mL/min, medical history of cancer Highly relevant for stable CVD 
CANVAS Program Canagliflozin Strong (1011) 66% Majority Recent ACS, NYHA IV, eGFR < 30 mL/min, medical history of cancer Highly relevant for stable CVD 
LEADER GLP-1 receptor agonist Liraglutide Strong (1302) 81% Majority Recent ACS, NYHA IV, malignant neoplasm Highly relevant for stable CVD 
SUSTAIN-6 Semaglutide Moderate (254) 59% Majority Recent ACS, NYHA IV, malignant neoplasm, pancreatitis Relevant for stable CVD 
EXSCEL Exenatide Strong (1744) 73% Majority eGFR < 30 mL/min, personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, history of pancreatitis Highly relevant for stable CVD 
ELIXA Lixisenatide Adequate (805) 100% (ACS) Vast majority eGFR < 30 mL/min, pancreatitis, gastrointestinal disease, personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer Highly relevant for ACS 
PROACTIVE Thiazolidinedione Pioglitazone Strong (1086) 100% Majority Recent ACS, symptomatic heart failure, ketoacidosis Highly relevant for stable CVD 
SAVOR-TIMI 53 Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor Saxagliptin Strong (1222) 79% Majority Recent ACS Highly relevant for stable CVD 
EXAMINE Alogliptin Adequate (621) 100% (ACS within the previous 15–90 days) Vast majority Recent ACS, NYHA IV Highly relevant for ACS 
TECOS Sitagliptin Strong (1690) 74% Majority eGFR < 30 mL/min, ketoacidosis Highly relevant for stable CVD 
UKPDS 34 Biguanide Metformin Moderate (139 during follow-up of > 10 years) NR Limited use >65 years of age Limited relevance for CVD 
STOP-NIDDM Alpha-glucosidase inhibitor Acarbose (compared to sulfonylurea) Hypothesis generating study (47) <5% Limited use Any cardiovascular event within the last 6 months Limited relevance for CVD 

ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CVD, cardiovascular disease; NA, not applicable; NR, not reported.

Table 2

Outcome for patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease

Study Class of drug Drug Median follow-up (years) Reduction of (NNT)
 
Specific adverse effects (NNHaEvidence for benefit/harm of investigational drug 
Primary composite cardiovascular endpoint Secondary cardiovascular endpoints All-cause mortality 
EMPA-REG OUTCOME SGLT2 inhibitor Empagliflozin 3.1 Yes (61) Cardiovascular death (45), heart failure hospitalization (72) Yes (39) Genital infection (22), volume depletion in patients ≥75 years, ketoacidosis Relevant benefit, particularly for patients at risk or with HF 
CANVASa Program Canagliflozin 2.4 Yes (72)a Heart failure hospitalization (104a, exploratory analysis) No Amputation (115a), low-trauma fractures, male genitalia infection (14aRelevant benefit at the cost of increased risk of amputations 
LEADER GLP-1 receptor agonist Liraglutide 3.8 Yes (55) Cardiovascular death (79) Yes (71) Injection site reaction with once daily sc injection (233), drug discontinuation due to nausea (79), acute gallstone disease (85) Relevant benefit 
SUSTAIN-6 Semaglutide 2.1 Yes (43) Non-fatal stroke (97) No Retinopathy (78), gastrointestinal disorders (66) Relevant benefit 
EXSCEL Exenatide 3.2 No No No [exploratory analysis yes (100)] Thyroid papillary carcinomas (n = 10 vs. 4) Non-significant trend for benefit 
ELIXA Lixisenatide 2.1 No No No Gastrointestinal disorders leading to drug discontinuation (27) No benefit 
PROACTIVE Thiazolidinedione Pioglitazone 2.9 No Composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, non-fatal MI and stroke (49), increase of HF hospitalization (NNH = 62) No Oedema wo heart failure (12) Potential benefit, increased risk of HF hospitalization 
SAVOR-TIMI 53 Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor Saxagliptin 2.1 No Increase of HF hospitalization (NNH = 140) No Increased (but very rare) occurrence of non-fatal angioedema No benefit, increased risk of HF hospitalization 
EXAMINE Alogliptin 2.1 No No No NR No benefit 
TECOS Sitagliptin 3.0 No No No NR No benefit 
UKPDS 34 Biguanide Metformin 10.7 Yes (11) Non-fatal MI (16) Yes (11) NR Potential cardiovascular benefit in patients wo CVD 
STOP-NIDDM Alpha- glucosidase inhibitor Acarbose (compared to sulfonylurea) 3.38 Yes (40) Non-fatal MI (62) NR Premature study drug discontinuation (8) Hypothesis generation for potential cardiovascular benefit in patients wo CVD 
Study Class of drug Drug Median follow-up (years) Reduction of (NNT)
 
Specific adverse effects (NNHaEvidence for benefit/harm of investigational drug 
Primary composite cardiovascular endpoint Secondary cardiovascular endpoints All-cause mortality 
EMPA-REG OUTCOME SGLT2 inhibitor Empagliflozin 3.1 Yes (61) Cardiovascular death (45), heart failure hospitalization (72) Yes (39) Genital infection (22), volume depletion in patients ≥75 years, ketoacidosis Relevant benefit, particularly for patients at risk or with HF 
CANVASa Program Canagliflozin 2.4 Yes (72)a Heart failure hospitalization (104a, exploratory analysis) No Amputation (115a), low-trauma fractures, male genitalia infection (14aRelevant benefit at the cost of increased risk of amputations 
LEADER GLP-1 receptor agonist Liraglutide 3.8 Yes (55) Cardiovascular death (79) Yes (71) Injection site reaction with once daily sc injection (233), drug discontinuation due to nausea (79), acute gallstone disease (85) Relevant benefit 
SUSTAIN-6 Semaglutide 2.1 Yes (43) Non-fatal stroke (97) No Retinopathy (78), gastrointestinal disorders (66) Relevant benefit 
EXSCEL Exenatide 3.2 No No No [exploratory analysis yes (100)] Thyroid papillary carcinomas (n = 10 vs. 4) Non-significant trend for benefit 
ELIXA Lixisenatide 2.1 No No No Gastrointestinal disorders leading to drug discontinuation (27) No benefit 
PROACTIVE Thiazolidinedione Pioglitazone 2.9 No Composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, non-fatal MI and stroke (49), increase of HF hospitalization (NNH = 62) No Oedema wo heart failure (12) Potential benefit, increased risk of HF hospitalization 
SAVOR-TIMI 53 Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor Saxagliptin 2.1 No Increase of HF hospitalization (NNH = 140) No Increased (but very rare) occurrence of non-fatal angioedema No benefit, increased risk of HF hospitalization 
EXAMINE Alogliptin 2.1 No No No NR No benefit 
TECOS Sitagliptin 3.0 No No No NR No benefit 
UKPDS 34 Biguanide Metformin 10.7 Yes (11) Non-fatal MI (16) Yes (11) NR Potential cardiovascular benefit in patients wo CVD 
STOP-NIDDM Alpha- glucosidase inhibitor Acarbose (compared to sulfonylurea) 3.38 Yes (40) Non-fatal MI (62) NR Premature study drug discontinuation (8) Hypothesis generation for potential cardiovascular benefit in patients wo CVD 

NNT/NNH number needed to treat/harm was calculated only for significant results with the formula 100/absolute difference of endpoint in % for the given follow-up period.

ACS, acute coronary syndrome; NR, not reported.

a

NNTs/NNHs were calculated based on the given event rates per 1000 patient years and transformed for a follow-up of 3 years.

Table 2

Outcome for patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease

Study Class of drug Drug Median follow-up (years) Reduction of (NNT)
 
Specific adverse effects (NNHaEvidence for benefit/harm of investigational drug 
Primary composite cardiovascular endpoint Secondary cardiovascular endpoints All-cause mortality 
EMPA-REG OUTCOME SGLT2 inhibitor Empagliflozin 3.1 Yes (61) Cardiovascular death (45), heart failure hospitalization (72) Yes (39) Genital infection (22), volume depletion in patients ≥75 years, ketoacidosis Relevant benefit, particularly for patients at risk or with HF 
CANVASa Program Canagliflozin 2.4 Yes (72)a Heart failure hospitalization (104a, exploratory analysis) No Amputation (115a), low-trauma fractures, male genitalia infection (14aRelevant benefit at the cost of increased risk of amputations 
LEADER GLP-1 receptor agonist Liraglutide 3.8 Yes (55) Cardiovascular death (79) Yes (71) Injection site reaction with once daily sc injection (233), drug discontinuation due to nausea (79), acute gallstone disease (85) Relevant benefit 
SUSTAIN-6 Semaglutide 2.1 Yes (43) Non-fatal stroke (97) No Retinopathy (78), gastrointestinal disorders (66) Relevant benefit 
EXSCEL Exenatide 3.2 No No No [exploratory analysis yes (100)] Thyroid papillary carcinomas (n = 10 vs. 4) Non-significant trend for benefit 
ELIXA Lixisenatide 2.1 No No No Gastrointestinal disorders leading to drug discontinuation (27) No benefit 
PROACTIVE Thiazolidinedione Pioglitazone 2.9 No Composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, non-fatal MI and stroke (49), increase of HF hospitalization (NNH = 62) No Oedema wo heart failure (12) Potential benefit, increased risk of HF hospitalization 
SAVOR-TIMI 53 Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor Saxagliptin 2.1 No Increase of HF hospitalization (NNH = 140) No Increased (but very rare) occurrence of non-fatal angioedema No benefit, increased risk of HF hospitalization 
EXAMINE Alogliptin 2.1 No No No NR No benefit 
TECOS Sitagliptin 3.0 No No No NR No benefit 
UKPDS 34 Biguanide Metformin 10.7 Yes (11) Non-fatal MI (16) Yes (11) NR Potential cardiovascular benefit in patients wo CVD 
STOP-NIDDM Alpha- glucosidase inhibitor Acarbose (compared to sulfonylurea) 3.38 Yes (40) Non-fatal MI (62) NR Premature study drug discontinuation (8) Hypothesis generation for potential cardiovascular benefit in patients wo CVD 
Study Class of drug Drug Median follow-up (years) Reduction of (NNT)
 
Specific adverse effects (NNHaEvidence for benefit/harm of investigational drug 
Primary composite cardiovascular endpoint Secondary cardiovascular endpoints All-cause mortality 
EMPA-REG OUTCOME SGLT2 inhibitor Empagliflozin 3.1 Yes (61) Cardiovascular death (45), heart failure hospitalization (72) Yes (39) Genital infection (22), volume depletion in patients ≥75 years, ketoacidosis Relevant benefit, particularly for patients at risk or with HF 
CANVASa Program Canagliflozin 2.4 Yes (72)a Heart failure hospitalization (104a, exploratory analysis) No Amputation (115a), low-trauma fractures, male genitalia infection (14aRelevant benefit at the cost of increased risk of amputations 
LEADER GLP-1 receptor agonist Liraglutide 3.8 Yes (55) Cardiovascular death (79) Yes (71) Injection site reaction with once daily sc injection (233), drug discontinuation due to nausea (79), acute gallstone disease (85) Relevant benefit 
SUSTAIN-6 Semaglutide 2.1 Yes (43) Non-fatal stroke (97) No Retinopathy (78), gastrointestinal disorders (66) Relevant benefit 
EXSCEL Exenatide 3.2 No No No [exploratory analysis yes (100)] Thyroid papillary carcinomas (n = 10 vs. 4) Non-significant trend for benefit 
ELIXA Lixisenatide 2.1 No No No Gastrointestinal disorders leading to drug discontinuation (27) No benefit 
PROACTIVE Thiazolidinedione Pioglitazone 2.9 No Composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, non-fatal MI and stroke (49), increase of HF hospitalization (NNH = 62) No Oedema wo heart failure (12) Potential benefit, increased risk of HF hospitalization 
SAVOR-TIMI 53 Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor Saxagliptin 2.1 No Increase of HF hospitalization (NNH = 140) No Increased (but very rare) occurrence of non-fatal angioedema No benefit, increased risk of HF hospitalization 
EXAMINE Alogliptin 2.1 No No No NR No benefit 
TECOS Sitagliptin 3.0 No No No NR No benefit 
UKPDS 34 Biguanide Metformin 10.7 Yes (11) Non-fatal MI (16) Yes (11) NR Potential cardiovascular benefit in patients wo CVD 
STOP-NIDDM Alpha- glucosidase inhibitor Acarbose (compared to sulfonylurea) 3.38 Yes (40) Non-fatal MI (62) NR Premature study drug discontinuation (8) Hypothesis generation for potential cardiovascular benefit in patients wo CVD 

NNT/NNH number needed to treat/harm was calculated only for significant results with the formula 100/absolute difference of endpoint in % for the given follow-up period.

ACS, acute coronary syndrome; NR, not reported.

a

NNTs/NNHs were calculated based on the given event rates per 1000 patient years and transformed for a follow-up of 3 years.

更新日期:2017-11-08
down
wechat
bug