当前位置: X-MOL 学术JAMA › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Pediatric Exclusivity and Regulatory Authority
JAMA ( IF 120.7 ) Pub Date : 2018-01-02 , DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.16477
Jeanie Kim 1 , Joseph S. Ross 1, 2 , Amy Kapczynski 1
Affiliation  

In May 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) denied a 6-month extension of market exclusivity for Sensipar (cinacalcet), a drug manufactured by Amgen to manage hypercalcemia, common among patients with end-stage renal disease who are undergoing dialysis. The FDA determined that Amgen’s pediatric studies had been conducted inadequately and had provided inconclusive safety data. Amgen brought a lawsuit, Amgen v HHS (US Department of Health and Human Services), to challenge the denial.1 If Amgen prevails, it can delay generic competition for 6 months for a drug that generated $1.24 billion of revenue in 2016.2 More broadly, a decision favoring Amgen could diminish the FDA’s ability to encourage clinically meaningful pediatric studies and thus undermine the purpose of Congress in offering patent extensions to reward pediatric research.

中文翻译:

儿科排他性和监管机构

2017 年 5 月,美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA) 拒绝将 Sensipar(西那卡塞)的市场独占权延长 6 个月,这是一种由 Amgen 生产的药物,用于管理高钙血症,在接受透析的终末期肾病患者中很常见. FDA 确定安进的儿科研究进行得不充分,并提供了不确定的安全数据。Amgen 提起诉讼,Amgen v HHS(美国卫生与公共服务部),以挑战否认。1 如果 Amgen 获胜,它可以将一种在 2016 年产生 12.4 亿美元收入的药物的仿制药竞争推迟 6 个月。2 更广泛地说,有利于安进的决定可能会削弱 FDA 鼓励具有临床意义的儿科研究的能力,从而破坏国会提供专利延期以奖励儿科研究的目的。
更新日期:2018-01-02
down
wechat
bug