Abstract In this Reply we demonstrate that the nano domains reported in our paper commented by D. Banerjee cannot be the artifacts induced by hydrogen absorption from electropolishing, as assumed by D. Banerjee. The effects of two different TEM sample preparation methods (ion milling and electropholishing) were verified and compared with some results in the literature. The formation of the interface α domains in Ti-7333 in our published work has the same origin as the secondary α domains formed on the existing α in Ti-6Al-4V predicted by the 3D phase field simulations by R. Shi and Y. Z. Wang.

中文翻译：

---

回复“β-α相变过程中由晶格应变引起的亚稳态β钛合金中α相的复合结构”的评论。D.班纳吉

摘要 在本答复中，我们证明 D. Banerjee 评论的我们论文中报告的纳米域不能是 D. Banerjee 假设的由电解抛光吸氢引起的伪影。验证了两种不同的 TEM 样品制备方法（离子研磨和电抛光）的效果，并与文献中的一些结果进行了比较。在我们发表的工作中，Ti-7333 中界面 α 畴的形成与在 Ti-6Al-4V 中现有 α 上形成的次级 α 畴具有相同的起源，这是由 R. Shi 和 YZ Wang 的 3D 相场模拟预测的。