This commentary makes three points: (1) the existing evidence does not consistently favor the proposed sex difference in attractiveness preferences, nor the fitness-related outcomes of attractiveness; (2) the neglected association of perceived attractiveness and trustworthiness allowed the authors to incorrectly attribute many findings solely to attractiveness, and (3) the importance accorded attractiveness in mate preferences is culturally shaped and likely evolutionarily novel.

中文翻译：

---

遗漏的证据破坏了对吸引力偏见的性动机解释

该评论提出三点：（1）现有证据并不始终支持所提出的吸引力偏好的性别差异，也不支持与健康相关的吸引力结果；(2) 被忽视的吸引力和可信度之间的关联使作者错误地将许多发现仅仅归因于吸引力，以及 (3) 吸引力在配偶偏好中的重要性是文化塑造的，并且可能在进化上是新颖的。