当前位置: X-MOL 学术Nat. Rev. Cardiol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Expert consensus document: A 'diamond' approach to personalized treatment of angina
Nature Reviews Cardiology ( IF 49.6 ) Pub Date : 2017-09-07 , DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.131
Roberto Ferrari , Paolo G. Camici , Filippo Crea , Nicolas Danchin , Kim Fox , Aldo P. Maggioni , Athanasios J. Manolis , Mario Marzilli , Giuseppe M. C. Rosano , José L. Lopez-Sendon

In clinical guidelines, drugs for symptomatic angina are classified as being first choice (β-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, short-acting nitrates) or second choice (ivabradine, nicorandil, ranolazine, trimetazidine), with the recommendation to reserve second-choice medications for patients who have contraindications to first-choice agents, do not tolerate them, or remain symptomatic. No direct comparisons between first-choice and second-choice treatments have demonstrated the superiority of one group of drugs over the other. Meta-analyses show that all antianginal drugs have similar efficacy in reducing symptoms, but provide no evidence for improvement in survival. The newer, second-choice drugs have more evidence-based clinical data that are more contemporary than is available for traditional first-choice drugs. Considering some drugs, but not others, to be first choice is, therefore, difficult. Moreover, double or triple therapy is often needed to control angina. Patients with angina can have several comorbidities, and symptoms can result from various underlying pathophysiologies. Some agents, in addition to having antianginal effects, have properties that could be useful depending on the comorbidities present and the mechanisms of angina, but the guidelines do not provide recommendations on the optimal combinations of drugs. In this Consensus Statement, we propose an individualized approach to angina treatment, which takes into consideration the patient, their comorbidities, and the underlying mechanism of disease.



中文翻译:

专家共识文件:“心绞痛”个性化治疗心绞痛的“方法”

在临床指南中,用于症状性心绞痛的药物被分类为第一选择(β受体阻滞剂,钙通道阻断剂,短效硝酸盐)或第二选择(伊伐布雷定,尼可地尔,雷诺嗪,曲美他嗪),建议保留第二选择对首选药物有禁忌症,不耐受或仍然有症状的患者的药物。首选治疗和第二选择治疗之间没有直接的比较表明一类药物优于另一类药物。荟萃分析显示,所有抗心绞痛药物在减轻症状方面具有相似的功效,但没有提供改善生存率的证据。与传统的首选药物相比,较新的首选药物具有更多的循证临床数据,具有更现代的意义。考虑一些药物,因此,要成为第一选择是困难的,但不是其他人。而且,经常需要双重或三重疗法来控制心绞痛。患有心绞痛的患者可以有多种合并症,并且症状可能是由各种潜在的病理生理学引起的。某些药物除具有抗心绞痛作用外,还具有一些可能有用的特性,具体取决于存在的合并症和心绞痛的机制,但指南并未就药物的最佳组合提供建议。在本共识声明中,我们提出了一种针对心绞痛的个体化治疗方法,该方法考虑了患者,患者的合并症和潜在的疾病机制。患有心绞痛的患者可以有多种合并症,并且症状可能是由各种潜在的病理生理学引起的。某些药物除具有抗心绞痛作用外,还具有一些可能有用的特性,具体取决于存在的合并症和心绞痛的机制,但指南并未提供有关药物最佳组合的建议。在本共识声明中,我们提出了一种针对心绞痛的个体化治疗方法,该方法考虑了患者,患者的合并症和潜在的疾病机制。患有心绞痛的患者可以有多种合并症,并且症状可能是由各种潜在的病理生理学引起的。某些药物除具有抗心绞痛作用外,还具有一些可能有用的特性,具体取决于存在的合并症和心绞痛的机制,但指南并未就药物的最佳组合提供建议。在本共识声明中,我们提出了一种针对心绞痛的个体化治疗方法,该方法考虑了患者,患者的合并症和潜在的疾病机制。但该指南并未提供有关最佳药物组合的建议。在本共识声明中,我们提出了一种针对心绞痛的个体化治疗方法,该方法考虑了患者,患者的合并症和潜在的疾病机制。但该指南并未提供有关最佳药物组合的建议。在本共识声明中,我们提出了一种针对心绞痛的个体化治疗方法,该方法考虑了患者,患者的合并症和潜在的疾病机制。

更新日期:2017-09-07
down
wechat
bug