当前位置: X-MOL 学术Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Clinical Psychology Training: Accreditation and Beyond
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology ( IF 18.4 ) Pub Date : 2017-05-08 00:00:00 , DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093559
Robert W. Levenson 1
Affiliation  

Beginning with efforts in the late 1940s to ensure that clinical psychologists were adequately trained to meet the mental health needs of the veterans of World War II, the accreditation of clinical psychologists has largely been the province of the Commission on Accreditation of the American Psychological Association. However, in 2008 the Psychological Clinical Science Accreditation System began accrediting doctoral programs that adhere to the clinical science training model. This review discusses the goals of accreditation and the history of the accreditation of graduate programs in clinical psychology, and provides an overview of the evaluation procedures used by these two systems. Accreditation is viewed against the backdrop of the slow rate of progress in reducing the burden of mental illness and the changes in clinical psychology training that might help improve this situation. The review concludes with a set of five recommendations for improving accreditation.

中文翻译:


临床心理学培训:认证及超越

从1940年代后期开始,努力确保对临床心理学家进行充分的培训,以满足二战老兵的心理健康需求,临床心理学家的认证在很大程度上一直是美国心理学会认证委员会的职责范围。但是,在2008年,心理临床科学认证系统开始对遵循临床科学培训模型的博士课程进行认证。这篇综述讨论了认证目标和临床心理学研究生课程的认证历史,并概述了这两个系统所使用的评估程序。认可是在减轻精神疾病负担的进展缓慢的背景下进行的,而临床心理学培训的变化可能有助于改善这种情况。审查结束时提出了一系列五项建议,以提高认可度。

更新日期:2017-05-08
down
wechat
bug