当前位置: X-MOL 学术Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Effect of Telemedicine Education and Telemonitoring on CPAP Adherence: The Tele-OSA Randomized Trial
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine ( IF 24.7 ) Pub Date : 2017-08-31 , DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201703-0582oc
Dennis Hwang 1 , Jeremiah W. Chang 1 , Adam V. Benjafield 2 , Maureen E. Crocker 2 , Colleen Kelly 3 , Kendra A. Becker 1 , Joseph B. Kim 1 , Rosa R. Woodrum 1 , Joanne Liang 1 , Stephen F. Derose 1, 4
Affiliation  

Rationale– Automated telemedicine interventions could potentially improve adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP). Objective–Examining the effects of telemedicine-delivered obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) education and CPAP telemonitoring with automated patient feedback messaging on CPAP adherence. Methods–This 4-arm, randomized, factorial-design clinical trial enrolled 1455 patients (51.0% women, age 49.1±12.5 years) referred for suspected OSA. 956 underwent home sleep apnea testing and 556 were prescribed CPAP. Two telemedicine interventions were implemented: (a) web-based OSA education (Tel-Ed); (b) CPAP telemonitoring with automated patient feedback (Tel-TM). Patients were randomized to (1) Usual Care, (2) Tel-Ed added, (3) Tel-TM added, or (4) Tel-Ed and Tel-TM added (Tel-Both). Measurements–Primary endpoint was 90-day CPAP usage. Secondary endpoints included attendance to OSA evaluation, and change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score. Main Results– CPAP average daily use at 90 days was 3.8±2.5, 4.0±2.4, 4.4±2.2 and 4.8±2.3 hours in Usual Care, Tel-Ed, Tel-TM and Tel-Both groups. Usage was significantly higher in the Tel-TM and Tel-Both groups versus Usual Care (p=0.0002 for both) but not for Tel-Ed (p=0.10). Medicare adherence rates were 53.5%, 61.0%, 65.6% and 73.2% in Usual Care, Tel-Ed, Tel-TM and Tel-Both groups (Tel-Both vs Usual Care, p=0.001; Tel-TM vs Usual Care, p=0.003; Tel-Ed vs Usual Care, p=0.07). Telemedicine education improved clinic attendance compared to no telemedicine education (show rate 68.5% vs 62.7%; p=0.02). Conclusions–The use of CPAP telemonitoring with automated feedback messaging improved 90-day adherence in OSA patients. Telemedicine-based education did not significantly improve CPAP adherence but did increase clinic attendance for OSA evaluation. Clinical trial registration available at www.clinicaltrials.gov, ID NCT02279901.

中文翻译:

远程医疗教育和远程监控对CPAP依从性的影响:Tele-OSA随机试验

理由–自动化的远程医疗干预措施可能会改善对持续气道正压通气疗法(CPAP)的依从性。目的–通过自动患者反馈消息,检查远程医疗传递的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)教育和CPAP远程监护对CPAP依从性的影响。方法–这项4臂,随机,因子设计的临床试验招募了1455例疑似OSA的患者(女性51.0%,年龄49.1±12.5岁)。956人接受了家庭睡眠呼吸暂停测试,其中556人接受了CPAP处方。实施了两种远程医疗干预措施:(a)基于网络的OSA教育(Tel-Ed);(b)具有自动患者反馈(Tel-TM)的CPAP远程监视。患者被随机分配至(1)日常护理,(2)添加了Tel-Ed,(3)添加了Tel-TM或(4)添加了Tel-Ed和Tel-TM(Tel-Both)。测量–主要终点为90天CPAP使用量。次要终点包括参加OSA评估以及Epworth Sleepiness Scale评分的变化。主要结果–在日常护理,Tel-Ed,Tel-TM和Tel-Both组中,CPAP在90天的平均每日使用时间分别为3.8±2.5、4.0±2.4、4.4±2.2和4.8±2.3小时。与常规护理相比,Tel-TM和Tel-Both组的使用率显着更高(两者均为p = 0.0002),而Tel-Ed的使用率则没有(p = 0.10)。在“日常护理”,“ Tel-Ed”,“ Tel-TM”和“ Tel-Both”组中,Medicare依从率分别为53.5%,61.0%,65.6%和73.2%(Tel-Both vs.Usual Care,p = 0.001; Tel-TM vs.Usual Care, p = 0.003; Tel-Ed vs.Usual Care,p = 0.07)。与没有远程医疗教育相比,远程医疗教育提高了门诊率(显示率68.5%vs 62.7%; p = 0.02)。结论–将CPAP远程监控与自动反馈消息配合使用可改善OSA患者的90天依从性。基于远程医学的教育并未显着改善CPAP的依从性,但确实增加了OSA评估的门诊率。可通过www.clinicaltrials.gov获得IDC NCT02279901的临床试验注册信息。
更新日期:2017-09-05
down
wechat
bug